Has the Health fastidiousness system spoilt you? And should we hold Universal Health Care?
Answer: I am not for universal healthcare. I dont want to be working unyielding for the drug dealer or the peson who is apathetic and doesnt want to work.
I do, however beleive that health insurance should be made available and affordable to everyone but if someone isnt ready to work AND pay taxes later they shouldnt qualify.
I really believe there wishes to be something out there to relief the hard working, self-employed citizens and the hard working ancestors who dont get offered insurance through their place of employment. It wishes to be something that is affordable and that they cant be denied coverage due to pre-existing conditions.
I am adjectives for hard working folks to get affordable coverage but i dont want to see adjectives the hard working people's due dollars go to inactive people, illegals and drug dealer. Enough of our tax dollars already shift to cover women who cant keep near legs closed and keep have children that they cant afford. When i say this around women i am not talking something like women who have one or 2 children and have need of some assistance...I am talking nearly those who have 4,5,6 or more kids who are adjectives fathered by different men.
No, the government have failed! Why would you want the parliament to control every aspect of your health attention? Since the government cant do anything right, I dont surmise
I want them to control my health attention, Thanks,but no thanks!
YES and YES
The system as is have failed every American because it is rampant beside abuses which the US taxpayer pays for. It also requires insurance for most relatives to get modest care and when you're locked out through no slate of your own that is wrong.
I want QUALITY, ACCESSIBLE, AFFORDABLE form care for adjectives.
That means preventative charge (physical with follow up). Real medication (no Medicare "donut holes" the really unwell are ripped off again.) No bogus ridiculously low "caps" on needed medical procedures. No assault of the ER. No paying for the silly with the sniffles to shift to the doc for free. No more bankruptcies over medical bills. I want THIS plan that ends verbal abuse of the taxpayer, takes the burden rotten employers, provides price transparency, and ends the rip-off of the US taxpayer at the hand of greedy insurance CEOs (which has be repeatedly documented).
http://www.booklocker.com/books/3068.htm...
Read the PDF, not the blurb, for the bulk of the plan. Book is searchable on Amazon.com
Cassandra Nathan's Save America, Save the World
It does NOT mean UHC which NEVER works anywhere.
As one Canadian doc who have studied the system, and of course is working within the US now, noted:
"...Another sign of transformation: Canadian doctors, long silent on the health-care system’s problems, are starting to speak up. Last August, they voted Brian Day president of their national association. A former socialist who counts Fidel Castro as a personal nouns, Day has nevertheless become maybe the most vocal critic of Canadian public form care, have opened his own private surgery center as a remedy for long waiting list and then challenge the government to shut him down. “This is a country within which dogs can get a hip replacement contained by under a week,” he fumed to the New York Times, “and contained by which humans can wait two to three years.”
And very soon even Canadian governments are looking to the private sector to shrink the waiting list. Day’s clinic, for instance, handles workers’-compensation cases for human resources of both public and private corporations. In British Columbia, private clinics perform roughly 80 percent of government-funded diagnostic trialling. In Ontario, where fealty to socialized prescription has other been strong, the governing body recently hired a private firm to staff a rural hospital’s emergency room.
This privatizing trend is reaching Europe, too. Britain’s government-run condition care date back to the 1940s. Yet the Labour Party—which originally created the National Health Service and used to bristle at the suggestion of private medication, dismissing it as “Americanization”—now openly favors privatization. Sir William Wells, a senior British condition official, lately said: “The big trouble with a state monopoly is that it builds surrounded by massive inefficiencies and inward-looking culture.” Last year, the private sector provided about 5 percent of Britain’s nonemergency procedures; Labour aims to triple that percentage by 2008. The Labour senate also works to voucherize certain surgeries, offering patients a choice of four providers, at smallest one private. And in a recent move, the elected representatives will contract out some primary care services, possibly to American firms such as UnitedHealth Group and Kaiser Permanente.
Sweden’s government, after the completion of the hottest round of privatizations, will be contracting out some 80 percent of Stockholm’s primary care and 40 percent of its total strength services, including one of the city’s largest hospitals. Since the fall of Communism, Slovakia have looked to liberalize its state-run system, introducing co-payments and privatizations. And modest market reform have begin in Germany: increasing co-pays, enhancing insurance competition, and turning state enterprise over to the private sector (within a decade, only a minority of German hospitals will remain underneath state control). It’s important to document that change contained by these countries is slow and gradual—market reforms remain controversial. But if the United States be once the exception for viewing a vibrant private sector in vigour care as essential, it is so no longer."
http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_3_ca...
http://www.pc-safe.info/