Spinal decompression: general public who own done it
FINDINGS::: THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAE SHOW NORMAL HEIGHT AND SIGNAL INTENSITYTHERE IS STRAIGHTENING OF THE LUMBAR CURVATURE. NO SUBLUXATIONS THERE APPEARS TO BE PARTIAL LUMBARIZATION OF S1.THE MOST CAUDAL TRUE INTERVERTEBRAL LUMBAR TYPE DISK WILL BE PRESUMED TO REPRESENT L5-S1. THERE IS DISK DEGENERATION L4-5 AND L5-S1 MAINFESTED BY LOSS OF DISK HEIGHT AND SIGNAL. THERE IS A SCHMORL'S NODE AT L4-5. L5-S1: THERE IS A SMALL PARACENTRAL DISK PROTRUSION, 3 MM IN THICKNESS THAT CONTACTS THE LEFT S1 NERVE ROOT WITHOUT DEFORMING IT. FACET ARTHROSIS IS PRESENT. THE LEFT NEURAL FORAMEN SHOWS MILD TO MODERATE NARROWING. THERE IS NO ASSOCIATED DEFORMITY OF THE TRANSITING LEFT L5 NERVE ROOT, HOWEVER. L4-5: THERE IS A BROAD POSTERIOR DISK PROTRUSION 5 MM IN THICKNESS PRODUCING CONSIDERABLE DEFORMITY OF THE VENTRAL MARGIN OF THE DURAL SAC. THERE IS FACET ARTHROSIS. THE NEURAL FORAMINA IS PATENT. L3-4: NO COMPROMISE OF THE DURAL SAC OR NEURAL FORAMINA. L2-3: NO COMPROMISE OF THE DURAL SAC OR NEURAL FORAMINA. THE CONUS TERMINATES AT THE L1-2 LEVEL AND IS GROSSLY UNREMARKEABLE THERE IS AN ELEMENT OF CONGENITAL; NARROWING OF THE SPINAL CANAL DUE TO SHORT PEDICLES
The above MRI is the one taht I got done 3 months ago.
1. I would like to know whether the relations who have done it found it useful or not.
2. If you have a similar condition have 2 disk prolapses at L4-L5 and L-5 S-1 level how much better did you win
3. Please reply to this question only if you have got this procedure done, please restrict from giving any personal opinion, I would appreciate if I am single given the hard facts and nothing but the facts please.
Thanks surrounded by advance, I do appreciate it as those people who own had treatment would sincerely know in how much distress I am within.
Abhi
Answer: Your problem is from here L4-5: THERE IS A BROAD POSTERIOR DISK PROTRUSION 5 MM IN THICKNESS PRODUCING CONSIDERABLE DEFORMITY OF THE VENTRAL MARGIN OF THE DURAL SAC. Pain in your legs and butt will resolve immediately. It is the right surgery for you. I enjoy seen more than 200 of these. If you are overweight lose it, it's bad for your backbone and your knees. .
I personally have used a traction bed at a chiropractor to assist with compression of my spine and slight scoliosis. However, last year my dad who have had disk problems for years underwent decompression treatments. The MD suggested surgery if the cardio would sign stale. Well despite having CHF, and blood clots in his lungs a few months until that time thus being on blood thinners the cardio thought they could do a procedure and ok'd him for surgery. He had fusion done 40 years ago within the L3-4 I believe, then 20 years ago had a similar surgery contained by his neck for a slipped/herniated disk. Dad at 80 didn't think in attendance should be any problems since he had done it before. The rest of us have seen him have complications on other more recent surgeries weren't sure surgery would be worth the risks. We spoke not lone to an orthopedic surgeon who preferred to try shots first and an internationally known neuro-surgeon who also agreed he could do the surgery but general surgical risks would be amazingly high. He had 2 disks one above and one below the innovative lower back fusion that were cause the problems. He could hardly shuffle or move, a complete change from newly a few months before even.
The bulging disks, flattened disks basicly mean the fluid is gone and the bones are rubbing cause pain and limitations.
I heard around decompression therapy and started looking into various machines and where on earth they were available around us. I liked the DRX information the best and truly found 2 of them an hour away from us in different directions. We visited one, have free consult including an s-EMG. We watched a video about it and the doctor explained it intensely well to us. His treatment was going to be 3x week, after 2x, then weekly then spaced farther and farther apart. They would include a few minutes surrounded by a zero-gravity chair, a massage, after time on the machine. We thought it sounded great but it was going to be reasonably expensive and most insurance didn't cover. Approx $5,000 for 20 treatments. We still liked the option better than surgery, and it offered more hope for long-term longer or being able to own single treatments later as needed than the shots would. We looked into more brands... then go to visit the other doctor with the DRX and he operate more like the company information read in doing 20-25 treatments contained by a row (daily) then maybe an occassional treatment if mandatory. His treatments included a manipulation, machine time, then gaping heat treatment (kinda like TENS), and a smaller element to use at home also. He had a much more reasonable rate and seem more for the money.
Results, the pain that had my dad basicly incompetent to walk and having to physically raise up his leg was much better in a week. He be able to walk... The piece of equipment specifies which disk is being worked on, so to an extent only does one at a time. By the time the treatments be over he was walking at least a partly mile daily and within another month or two be close to 2 miles. The pain has be minimal and occassional, although some is there but it definitely be well worth the time and money, not to do potentially life-threatening surgery.
You have more than disk problems which I don't remember reading within his MRI results. If you are young and in correct physical health surgery may be the best longest lasting possibility, but I'd seriously look into decompression. We met several others that have been through decompression while going and they all be very positive and ranged from 30's to dad's 80. Be sure to ask question and choose the doctor who is going to monitor the machines and not turn it over to their office personnel after setting the machine the first look in.