Universal Health Care, is it a trueness or simply a pipe dream?

There have been verbalize about health thinking for all people for years immediately, maybe that's the problem, it's just adjectives talk and no action!!
Answer:

How do i do my own piercing by foot?

We don't want UHC--it does not work and certainly not as marketed.
Here's a sensible plan:
QUALITY, ACCESSIBLE, AFFORDABLE robustness care for all.
That technique preventative care (physical with follow up). Real medication (no Medicare "donut holes" the really not at your best are ripped off again.) No bogus ridiculously low "caps" on needed medical procedures. No abuse of the ER. No paying for the silly near the sniffles to go to the doc for free. No more bankruptcies over medical bills. I want THIS plan that ends ill-treat of the taxpayer, takes the burden off employer, provides price transparency, and ends the rip-off of the US taxpayer at the hands of greedy insurance CEOs (which has be repeatedly documented).
http://www.booklocker.com/books/3068.htm...
Read the PDF, not the blurb, for the bulk of the plan. Book is searchable on Amazon.com
Cassandra Nathan's Save America, Save the World

Here's a Canadian doc on realities of UHC:
"...Another sign of transformation: Canadian doctors, long silent on the health-care system’s problems, are starting to speak up. Last August, they voted Brian Day president of their national association. A former socialist who counts Fidel Castro as a personal acquaintance, Day have nevertheless become perhaps the most vocal critic of Canadian public vigour care, having open his own private surgery center as a remedy for long waiting lists and then challenge the government to shut him down. “This is a country in which dogs can acquire a hip replacement in under a week,” he fumed to the New York Times, “and surrounded by which humans can wait two to three years.”

And now even Canadian government are looking to the private sector to shrink the waiting lists. Day’s clinic, for instance, handles workers’-compensation cases for body of both public and private corporations. In British Columbia, private clinics perform roughly 80 percent of government-funded diagnostic testing. In Ontario, where on earth fealty to socialized medicine has other been strong, the government just this minute hired a private firm to staff a rural hospital’s emergency room.

This privatizing trend is reaching Europe, too. Britain’s government-run health care date back to the 1940s. Yet the Labour Party—which originally created the National Health Service and used to bristle at the suggestion of private medicine, dismissing it as “Americanization”—now widely favors privatization. Sir William Wells, a senior British health official, not long said: “The big trouble with a state monopoly is that it builds in massive inefficiencies and inward-looking culture.” Last year, the private sector provided almost 5 percent of Britain’s nonemergency procedures; Labour aims to triple that percentage by 2008. The Labour government also works to voucherize certain surgeries, offering patients a choice of four providers, at tiniest one private. And in a recent move, the government will contract out some primary carefulness services, perhaps to American firms such as UnitedHealth Group and Kaiser Permanente.

Sweden’s government, after the completion of the hottest round of privatizations, will be contracting out some 80 percent of Stockholm’s primary care and 40 percent of its total health services, including one of the city’s largest hospitals. Since the go down of Communism, Slovakia has looked to liberalize its state-run system, introducing co-payments and privatizations. And modest market reform have begun contained by Germany: increasing co-pays, enhancing insurance competition, and turning state enterprises over to the private sector (within a decade, only a minority of German hospitals will remain below state control). It’s important to note that swing in these countries is slow and gradual—market reforms remain controversial. But if the United States be once the exception for viewing a vibrant private sector in health precision as essential, it is so no longer."
http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_3_ca...

Hillarycare exists in Taxachusetts. For a measley 6.5 million, here's the early results:
"Massachusetts announced that spending on its condition care plan would increase by $400 million in 2008, a cost expected to be borne largely by taxpayers."
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/200...
Last modified: January 29. 2008 5:03AM
Article explains CA can't even take it off the ground.

SI common problems?

The biggest problem facing universal strength care is the fact that it will an across the board standard cost program. Doctors will no longer know how to charge fees either set by the AMA or by region. It will cost the same for bureau fees in Indiana as in Alaska, as will adjectives procedures. This is argued as a violation of "free enterprize". Doctors and health specialist spend a large amount of time and money investing in their choosen profession. They owe large amounts of money within student and business loans. In order to appease this situation with a broad-spectrum health care system the US parliament will need to address several issues. The issue of a professionals large debt could be address by having the Department of Education assume the loans and make obligatory adjustments to ease the payoff balance (extended time, etc.). It is a fact that SSI/Medicare/Medicaid are known to loose money contained by health debts unpaid and certain adjustment would need to be made to prevent this. These are but 2 issues of many that inevitability to be addressed before a system could be contained by place. The big obsticle is in free enterprize. Government should not tell a business what it can charge for services, consent to alone make it mandatory.
In my opinion, I get the impression universal health services would and can work surrounded by the US.

Dr. Tommy Skelton

HeAdAcHe!!?

i think the problem with the USA is the insurance comp.
they get their way to force insurance on cars now they will force insurance on individuals
they force the prices to horizontal that no one can afford paying cash for services
if it is a body shop
or a hospital
global health care is another small step away from freedom of choice and personal responsibility
i remember when American use to quip about Communism...

My maw are so dry and chaped and nought is working to construct them better?