Who'd to some extent hold condition insurance than "Free" National Health Care
Despite the imperfections in the system (and at hand are plenty) I'll keep what I have to some extent than Micheal Moore's fictitious nirvana of government run health fastidiousness.
Answer: The problem with health vigilance in our country is that it works on a supply and demand cause. While this works great in almost every aspect, when it comes to a vital service instead of have a normal supply/demand curve the line become almost vertical. Extreme prices are the rusult. In various industrys for vital services the governing body regulates prices. This is not true for the medical industry. Both political parties are coming up with fixes and both political party have failed. I don't believe that "Free Nationla Health Care" is the answer but fairly we should move into a price regulation policy. This has worked in other critical services such as electricty, and natural gas. I also believe that doctors should be more protected from lawsuits so that their malpractice insurance becomes affordable..
1 - Nothing is free. It comes out of taxes, increased prices and porer service.
#2 - Look at any country near national health care... the service is unacceptable, the waits are long, and the care is usually inferior.
#3 - Any economist will report you that efficiency is achieved when flea market forces rule. The problem in the USA is that the provider sets both the demand and the price - but manage care is dealing with that... somewhat.
I wouldn't changeover either..
Those who think that the "private sector" as it currently exists within the U.S. are the ones who are believing in a "fictitious nirvana."
I take it you hold never been designated as uninsurable, or are wealthy satisfactory to pay high premiums.
The horror stories nearly care in other countries are largely apocryphal, and mostly hold to do with elective procedures. I have talk to Canadians, Britons, Australians and New Zealanders about their care, and while they adjectives acknowledge their systems are not perfect, I have not found one who would trade what they enjoy for what we (don't) have.
It is unconscionable that we are the only industrialised nation contained by the Western world not to guarantee our citizens at least basic fastidiousness.
What is to be gained by people doing short care and/or being driven out of business? Do conservatives somehow think that builds character and "personal responsibility"?
Health keeping is a human right, not a commodity.
What it's going to take is people simply refuse to pay medical bills to force a collapse in the non-system, so something entirely brand new can be built out of its ashes..
Ditto David.
Free National Health Care... that phrase brings me unpleasant chills. Nothing from the government is free! Besides, contrary to what the democrats tell you, it is not the government's responsibility to pinch care of you.
I would literally die before I tolerate my government take away my freedom approaching that. Hooah! God bless our country..
the national health care can choose to assist you or not. so lets say that you inevitability a live or death surgery they can say i don't quality like doing the surgery.ok